<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <title>Lucky, the Tourist</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://luckythetourist.com/" />
    <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://luckythetourist.com/atom.xml" />
    <id>tag:luckythetourist.com,2011-09-08://2</id>
    <updated>2011-10-20T17:49:34Z</updated>
    <subtitle>For when life gives you kittens and you don&apos;t want to make kittenade.</subtitle>
    <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 5.12</generator>

<entry>
    <title>Gigabyte Z68XP-UD3P on Linux</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://luckythetourist.com/2011/09/gigabyte-z68xp-ud3p-on-linux.html" />
    <id>tag:luckythetourist.com,2011://2.8</id>

    <published>2011-09-19T18:37:09Z</published>
    <updated>2011-10-20T17:49:34Z</updated>

    <summary><![CDATA[The Gigabyte Z68XP-UD3P motherboard is mostly supported on Linux, but there is one caveat: the default&nbsp;Ethernet&nbsp;driver included in the kernel used in Ubuntu 11.04 is garbage. Upon installation, the Ethernet adapter would never go faster than 65 kB/s, and would...]]></summary>
    <author>
        <name>lucky</name>
        
    </author>
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://luckythetourist.com/">
        <![CDATA[The <b><a href="http://www.gigabyte.com/products/product-page.aspx?pid=3912#sp">Gigabyte Z68XP-UD3P</a></b> motherboard is mostly supported on Linux, but there is one caveat: the default&nbsp;Ethernet&nbsp;driver included in the kernel used in Ubuntu 11.04 is garbage. Upon installation, the Ethernet adapter would never go faster than 65 kB/s, and would only work for 30 seconds at a time, failing to transfer any data for several minutes at a time.<div><br /></div><div><b>Solution</b>: Gigabyte does not officially support Linux, but fortunately it is possible to get <a href="http://www.realtek.com/Downloads/downloadsView.aspx?Langid=1&amp;PNid=13&amp;PFid=5&amp;Level=5&amp;Conn=4&amp;DownTypeID=3&amp;GetDown=false#2">an updated driver from Realtek</a> which works perfectly.</div><div><br /></div>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Why I chose Movable Type</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://luckythetourist.com/2011/09/why-i-chose-movable-type.html" />
    <id>tag:beta.luckythetourist.com,2011://2.6</id>

    <published>2011-09-09T21:34:54Z</published>
    <updated>2011-10-20T17:41:39Z</updated>

    <summary>I&apos;ve been blogging off and on since 2006, and yet, as you can see, I don&apos;t have any of my old content. There are a few reasons for this, one being a lack of quality and relevance, but the biggest...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>lucky</name>
        
    </author>
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://luckythetourist.com/">
        <![CDATA[I've been blogging off and on since 2006, and yet, as you can see, I don't have any of my old content. There are a few reasons for this, one being a lack of quality and relevance, but the biggest reason is that I've always used cumbersome blog software. The first couple iterations of my blog were self-written, the first in PHP, then another in Django. I had always thought it was best to generate static files, and thus I created <a href="https://github.com/luckythetourist/staticgenerator">StaticGenerator</a>, which allowed me to generate static files while still publishing via the Django admin interface.<div><br /></div><div>Later I decided to scrap Django altogether and go with something simpler so I went with <a href="https://github.com/mojombo/jekyll">Jekyll</a>, a static site generation tool. In using it I had to write my own templates and setup my own atom feed, each of which I did by using examples written by someone else who also uses the tool. Unfortunately I didn't blog that often and I found that each time I wanted to write I struggled with the emotional hurdle of remembering how to use Jekyll with its types and meta data, and how to deploy it to my server. I simply didn't want to remember and just ended up not writing.</div><div><br /></div><div>Now, don't let me make you think Jekyll is a bad piece of software. It's written well and does exactly what it's intended to do. At the same time, it's just not for me. I no longer relish in creating websites as I once did. These days I write software that is far removed from the "web".</div><div><br /></div><div>The past few days I've been playing with different blogging software, things that would install easily on a simple vps, would require little administration, and have an interface that enables me to just write and be done with it. After playing with <a href="http://www.wordpress.org">Wordpress</a>, <a href="http://www.movabletype.org/">Movable Type</a> (5.12) and <a href="http://openmelody.org/">Melody</a> (a Movable Type 4.x fork), I've decided to go with Movable Type. As much as I like Wordpress, I prefer to have static file generation as a first-class freature, not an optional plugin like WP-SuperCache. And that's the power of Movable Type: You can write and publish your site in a way that is wholly dynamic, but with the performance of static files. The additional win is that all the features I want just work, like feeds, drafts, previews, comments, et cetera. In other words, I don't have to figure out why my self-written blog software sucks; I just write.</div><div><br /></div><div>So here's to a fresh start, brought to you by Movable Type.</div>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

</feed>

